eduimpact.ai Empowering educators. Inspiring Students. Apply for beta
How it works

A session, in plain sight.

No demos, no marketing screenshots. The way it actually works, on the side of the table you sit on.

Switch any time. Your choice doesn't lock anything in.
Sessions, in plain sight

When you've already done the standard moves twice.

Session 1 · reading instruction
eduimpact.ai · coaching session · private
You
My readers are stuck on multisyllabic words. I've already done the standard syllable-division lessons twice and we're not moving.
eduimpact.ai

It sounds like your kindergarteners are finding multisyllabic words particularly challenging despite multiple attempts with syllable division.

Introduce a "Word of the Day" where you choose a new multisyllabic word each day, break it down together, then use it in different sentences throughout the week. Start with simple two-syllable words and gradually increase complexity.

Use picture books that contain familiar multisyllabic words to read aloud daily. Highlight these words when reading and have students track them with pointers or sticky notes. This visual context helps connect meaning to pronunciation.

Create a word wall of multisyllabic words they've learned, adding new ones each week. Encourage students to refer to the wall during writing activities for support.

Would you like more ideas on engaging read-alouds that include these types of words?

Session 2 · classroom management
eduimpact.ai · coaching session · private
You
I have a student who's been checked out for weeks. New seat, more choice. Still not landing.
eduimpact.ai

It sounds like you've tried several approaches to engage this student, but they're still not connecting with the activities.

Create a one-on-one "check-in" time each day where you sit down with the student and ask them what they enjoyed or didn't enjoy about their day. Use visual aids like smiley faces or thumbs up/down to gauge their mood.

Incorporate more sensory-rich materials into your lessons, such as playdough or textured objects. Observe if these tactile activities capture their attention better than traditional methods.

Pair the student with a peer buddy who they seem to connect with during free time. Plan for 5-minute collaborative tasks where both students can work together on an activity.

What other strategies have you noticed that this student responds well to?

Session 3 · the parent meeting
eduimpact.ai · coaching session · private
You
Conference tomorrow with a parent who's been hard to read. I want to talk about her son's writing without putting her on the defensive. How would you open it?
eduimpact.ai

It sounds like you're approaching this conference with careful thought about how to discuss your student's writing progress while ensuring an open and supportive dialogue with the parent.

Start by acknowledging the challenges you've noticed in the child's writing, using specific examples from recent class activities or assignments. For instance, mention a particular day when he struggled to form letters correctly.

Transition into sharing observations about his strengths, such as how he consistently tries to write independently during morning work time, even if the results aren't always clear yet. This balance of constructive feedback and positive reinforcement helps set a collaborative tone.

Invite her input by asking how she sees her son's writing at home, ensuring you listen actively to any insights or concerns she shares.

Would it be helpful to practice opening lines for this conversation?

When you want a human in the loop

Schedule time with a certified coach.

Sometimes the AI is the start of a conversation, not the end. You can book a 1-on-1 with a certified instructional coach to think through strategies, work a specific situation, or sit with someone while you reflect on something hard.

How it works
For homeschool parents and classroom teachers.

You schedule when you want help.

Self-directed support, on your timing. Book a 1-on-1 the moment you know you need it. The coach reads your recent sessions before the call, so you don't spend the first ten minutes catching them up.

Coach 1-on-1s are an in-app add-on at $25 per 30-minute session, separate from your subscription.

What it's grounded in

Coaching, not search.

400+
Validated K–5 scenarios
Each one reviewed by certified instructional coaches before it shapes a single response.
1M+
Curated coaching resources
Books, papers, and field guides from the people who actually built modern instructional coaching.
0
Student data ever collected
eduimpact.ai is built around teacher reflection, not student observation. We never ask for student names, demographics, IEP information, or assessment data. Same privacy floor on every plan.

Ready to bring your real questions?

We're reviewing applications now for our first cohort of 50 K–5 educators. No card required.

Apply for beta access See pricing
How it works for your district

Three layers, one coaching system.

eduimpact.ai serves your org the way good coaching always has: each layer makes the layer below it stronger. Leaders see the heartbeat. Coaches focus where it matters. Teachers get the support they need, plus a human when they need a bit more.

For your leadership
Principals, instructional directors, district admin.

Get a heartbeat on every layer.

See usage patterns and themes flowing across your district in real time. Where coaching capacity is reaching, where it isn't, what's coming up most often. Aggregate signal only, never individual surveillance. Allocate where it's needed; teachers keep the privacy they need to ask honest questions.

For your coaches
Instructional coaches on staff.

Focus your effort on the people who need it.

eduimpact.ai handles the in-between, the question at 9pm, the teacher who wouldn't book a meeting. Coach 1-on-1s are bundled into school and district plans; your coaches schedule with their teachers and walk into each meeting already knowing what's been on a teacher's mind.

For your teachers
Every classroom teacher in the deployment.

Get the support you need, plus the human layer when you need a bit more.

A thinking partner that knows your curriculum, your policies, and how your district teaches. Available whenever the moment is, not just when a coach is free. Private. When the AI isn't enough, your coach is one click away.

Why this matters, by the numbers

The coaching gap your tool fills.

The problem isn't that schools don't believe in coaching. It's that the math doesn't work. Five numbers, with sources, that explain what eduimpact.ai is built to close.

26%
Of a coach's week is spent actually coaching
The rest goes to assessment admin, scheduling, and meetings. Even coaches expected to spend 60–80% of their time report only 29% in practice. Source: Deussen et al., 2007 (REL Northwest).
45–55
K–5 teachers per instructional coach in large Texas districts
Derived from the standard one-IC-per-elementary-campus model and TEA enrollment data. Katy ISD reports ~94,785 students across 79 schools at a 14:1 student-teacher ratio, putting most K–5 buildings in the 45–55 teacher range. Sources: Katy ISD enrollment (NCES); Katy Times reporting on the IC staffing model.
66%
Drop in coaching impact when programs scale without fidelity
Effect sizes shrink sharply when coaching loses structure under volume. The lever is consistency, not headcount. Source: Annenberg/Brown, EdResearch for Recovery synthesis.
+0.49 SD
Effect of consistent coaching on teaching practice
Roughly 40% better learning outcomes per student. The lever is dose and consistency, both of which are what we extend. Source: Kraft, Blazar & Hogan, 2018.
0
Student data collected on any deployment
eduimpact.ai is built around teacher reflection, not student observation. There is nothing to collect, because we never ask for it. School-managed, on-site, or hosted, the privacy floor is the same.
Run the math on your district

How much coaching is actually reaching your teachers?

Enter your numbers. We'll show the gap between what your teachers are getting today and the research-backed minimum effective dose.

Today
12.5min / teacher / week
Coaching time actually reaching each teacher, given the 26% reality from Deussen et al.
Research-backed minimum
30min / teacher / week
Minimum effective dose for measurable practice change. Source: EdResearch for Recovery, Annenberg/Brown.
Your teachers are getting roughly 41% of the research-backed minimum dose. eduimpact.ai extends your coaches' reach so the other 59% doesn't have to come from hiring.
Sources: Deussen et al., 2007 (REL Northwest, ERIC) · EdResearch for Recovery (Annenberg Institute, Brown University) · Katy ISD enrollment (NCES) · Methodology: calculator assumes the 26% Deussen ratio for direct coaching time and a 30 min/week minimum effective dose from the Annenberg/Brown synthesis.

Ready to scope a pilot?

We start with a single school or grade band. Pilot terms are written into the contract from day one.

Talk to our team See pricing